Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

[Cómo los profesionales perciben la relevancia de las métricas de productividad para un equipo ágil de desarrollo de software]

dc.rights.licensehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.contributor.authorHernández G.
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Á.
dc.contributor.authorJiménez R.
dc.contributor.authorJiménez F.
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-02T20:15:50Z
dc.date.available2024-12-02T20:15:50Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn16469895
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14112/28970
dc.description.abstractAgile methods have been adopted more frequently in software development. There is literature on the use of productivity metrics for work teams as a tool for continuous improvement in agile software development (ASD), however, works on the relevance that these measures may have for professionals who use agile methods is very limited. This paper contributes to this regard by answering the question: What is the level of relevance of productivity metrics for professionals who develop software and use agile methods? The answer was given from a survey that followed the protocol of Kitchenham and Pfleeger called Personal Opinion Surveys. The professional collaborators rated two aspects with a high level of relevance: the first, information is obtained on the effort required to implement a software product and the second is to measure the client benefits while the software is manufactured and it is operating. In addition, a path was established for the process of measuring the effort required in the early and frequent delivery of software, which adds value. © 2020, Associacao Iberica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informacao. All rights reserved.
dc.format13
dc.format.mediumRecurso electrónico
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherAssociacao Iberica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informacao
dc.rights.uriAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
dc.sourceRISTI - Revista Iberica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informacao
dc.sourceRev. Iberica Sist. Tecnol. Inf.
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleHow practitioners perceive the relevance of productivity metrics for an agile software development team
dc.title[Cómo los profesionales perciben la relevancia de las métricas de productividad para un equipo ágil de desarrollo de software]
datacite.contributorUniversidad Mariana, Facultad de Ingeniería, San Juan de Pasto, Colombia
datacite.contributorHernández G., Universidad Mariana, Facultad de Ingeniería, San Juan de Pasto, Colombia
datacite.contributorMartínez Á., Universidad Mariana, Facultad de Ingeniería, San Juan de Pasto, Colombia
datacite.contributorJiménez R., Universidad Mariana, Facultad de Ingeniería, San Juan de Pasto, Colombia
datacite.contributorJiménez F., Universidad Mariana, Facultad de Ingeniería, San Juan de Pasto, Colombia
datacite.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
oaire.resourcetypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Mariana
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Clara de Asis
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85094629061&partnerID=40&md5=47791fa554b3e1c3d4aac86b1730ced2
dc.relation.citationendpage609
dc.relation.citationstartpage596
dc.relation.citationvolume2020
dc.relation.iscitedby2
dc.relation.referencesAlahyari H., Berntsson R., Gorschek T., The Journal of Systems and Software A study of value in agile software development organizations, The Journal of Systems & Software, 125, pp. 271-288, (2017)
dc.relation.referencesBeck K., Beedle M., van Bennekum A., Cockburn A., Cunningham W., Fowler M., Kern J., Manifesto for Agile Software Development, (2001)
dc.relation.referencesCohn M., User Stories Applied: For Agile Software Development, (2004)
dc.relation.referencesDavis C.W.H., Agile Metrics in Action, (2015)
dc.relation.referencesDingsoyr T., Nerur S., Balijepally V., Moe N.B., A decade of agile methodologies: Towards explaining agile software development, Journal of Systems and Software, 85, 6, pp. 1213-1221, (2012)
dc.relation.referencesFenton N.E., Bieman J., Software Metrics: A Rigorous and Practical Approach, (2015)
dc.relation.referencesHernandez G., Martinez A., Argote I., Coral D., Metodología adaptativa basada en Scrum: Caso empresas de la Industria de Software en San Juan de Pasto-Colombia, Revista Tecnológica ESPOL, 28, 5, pp. 211-223, (2015)
dc.relation.referencesHernandez G., Martinez A., Jimenez R., Jimenez F., Métricas de productividad para equipo de trabajo de desarrollo ágil de software: Una revisión sistemática, TecnoLógicas, 22, pp. 63-81, (2019)
dc.relation.referencesHernandez G., Martinez A., Jimenez R., Jimenez F., Scrum y Peopleware: Elementos clave para la gestión en la construcción de software, Iberian Journal of Information Systems and Technologies, pp. 265-277, (2019)
dc.relation.referencesKapitsaki G.M., Christou M., Learning from the Current Status of Agile Adoption, International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering, 551, pp. 18-32, (2015)
dc.relation.referencesKhurum M., Gorschek T., Wilson M., The Software Value Map — an Exhaustive Collection of Value Aspects for the Development of Software Intensive Products, (2012)
dc.relation.referencesKitchenham B., Pfleeger S., Personal Opinion Surveys, Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering, (2008)
dc.relation.referencesKurnia R., Ferdiana R., Wibirama S., Theory A.S., Software Metrics Classification for Agile Scrum Process: A Literature Review, 2018 International Seminar on Research of Information Technology and Intelligent Systems (ISRITI), pp. 174-179, (2018)
dc.relation.referencesLo D., Nagappan N., Zimmermann T., How Practitioners Perceive the Relevance of Software Engineering Research, Proceedings of the 2015 10Th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering, pp. 415-425, (2015)
dc.relation.referencesOliveira E., Conte T., Cristo M., Mendes E., Software Project Managers’ Perceptions of Productivity Factors: Findings from a Qualitative Study, International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, (2016)
dc.relation.referencesRam P., Rodriguez P., Oivo M., Software process measurement and related challenges in agile software development: A multiple case study, Product-Focused Software Process Improvement 19Th International Conference, PROFES, 2018, pp. 272-287, (2018)
dc.relation.referencesRamirez-Mora S.L., Oktaba H., Productivity in Agile Software Development: A Systematic Mapping Study, Proceedings-2017 5Th International Conference in Software Engineering Research and Innovation, CONISOFT, 2017, pp. 44-53, (2018)
dc.relation.referencesRodriguez P., Markkula J., Oivo M., Turula K., Survey on agile and lean usage in finnish software industry, International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, pp. 139-148, (2012)
dc.relation.referencesSchwaber K., Sutherland J., 2017 Scrum Guide-The Definitive Guide to Scrum: The Rules of The Game, (2017)
dc.relation.referencesYamada S., Kii R., Software quality analysis for agile development, 2015 4Th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization: Trends and Future Directions, ICRITO 2015, (2015)
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject.keywordsAgile software development
dc.subject.keywordsPerformance evaluation
dc.subject.keywordsPersonal opinion surveys
dc.subject.keywordsProductivity
dc.subject.keywordsSoftware development management
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.spaArtículo científico
dc.relation.citationissueE32


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem